State Ex Rel. Davis v. Howell
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
In quo warranto proceedings brought November 12, 1930, by the State of Florida upon the relation of the Attorney-General, it is charged by information that R. C. Howell “on November 6, 1930, and thence continuously, has used, exercised and performed, and still does enjoy, use, exercise and perform, without warrant or authority, in violation of the Constitution and the laws of said State, the franchise, functions and powers of the office of sheriff in and for Putnam Cpunty, which said office and franchise and functions and powers thereof the said R. C. Howell, during all of the time aforesaid,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- In Re Advisory Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tappy v. State ex rel. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Tappy v. State ex rel. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1955