Legal Opinion

In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 24, 2008No. 1:99-cr-00276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court are several motions. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (“BCBS-MA”), Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota (“BCBS-MN”), Federated Mutual Insurance Company (“Federated”), and Health Care Service Corporation (“HCSC”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) move the Court to treble damages [Docket Nos. 887 & 891]; Mylan Laboratories Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambrex Corporation, and Gyma Laboratories (“Defendants”) move for remittitur under Rule 59(e) [Docket No. 890]; and Defendants move the Court to dismiss Blue Cross…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Health Care Serv. Corp. v. Mylan Labs., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2026
  3. In Re: lorazepam/cloraze v. Mylan LaboratoriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API