Legal Opinion
Cerezo-Martin v. Agroman
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided October 4, 2016No. CIVIL NO. 15-1350 (FAB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is defendant Ferrovial Agroman S.A. (“Ferrovial”)’s motion for summary judgment requesting the dismissal of this case in its entirety. (Docket No. 10.) Having considered defendant’s motion, as well as plaintiffs opposition, (Docket No. 15), the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural Background
On April 6, 2015, plaintiff Tomas Cerezo-Martin (“Cerezo”) filed a complaint against Ferrovial alleging discrimination on the basis of his national origin…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pizarro-Correa v. Puerto Rico Internal Revenue DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017
- Anchante v. WilkieDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
- Catala-Torres v. Lifelink Foundation, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2022
- Palomino-Alonso v. StoneMor Puerto Rico LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
- Perez-Abreu v. Metropol Hato Rey, LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024