Legal Opinion

Republic Steel Corp. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1538 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.

Alex Sbinsky, totally disabled by coal worker’s pneumoconiosis, was awarded benefits by a referee whose decision was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board. His employer, Republic Steel Corporation (Republic), argues that he failed to comply with the 120-day notice requirement of Section 311 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. «^l.1 We reverse.

The notice requirements of Section 311 are analyzed in Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 43 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 480, 407…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Novaselec v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API