Legal Opinion

Bourgeois v. Parish of St. Tammany, La.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 18, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-1364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant, Parish of St. Tammany, for summary judgment as to plaintiff’s claims regarding violation of federal antitrust laws and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Neither party has addressed the plaintiffs’ claims regarding federal preemption of the Parish’s ordinance.

Upon a review of the memoranda, the depositions and the record in this matter, the Court finds that there exists an issue of material fact as to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petition of Carpenter v. City of PetalMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Colorado Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Board of County Commissioners of PuebloDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996
  3. Colo. Manufactured Housing v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RSDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996
  4. Stanley Carpenter v. City of PetalMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API