Legal Opinion

Hui Mei Hung Chen v. Chen

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 14, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BAIME, J.A.D.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of a judgment of the Family Part confirming certain aspects of an arbitrator’s decision and modifying others. We are satisfied that the arbitrator “imperfectly exercised [her] powers” and that the Family Part erred by failing to vacate the award. N.J.S.A 2A:24-8.

I

Plaintiff Hui Mei Chen and defendant Michael Chen, both citizens of Taiwan, were married in 1964. During the marriage, plaintiff resided in New Jersey, and defendant continued to live in Taiwan while making monthly visits here. In 1991,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Tretina Printing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Fantony v. FantonySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kakstys v. StevensNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API