Legal Opinion

In re Guardianship of Wonderly

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1984No. 83-290PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented in the instant appeal is whether, under the circumstances of the case at bar, appellees are entitled to legal expenses from the estates of the minors.

R.C. 2111.13 states in part:

“When a guardian is appointed to have the custody and maintenance of a ward and to have charge of the education of such ward, if such ward is a minor, his duties are:
“(A) To protect and control the person of his ward;
“(B) To provide suitable maintenance for his ward when necessary, which must be paid out of the estate of such ward upon the order of the guardian of the person of such ward;
“(C) To…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Guardianship of LloydOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Guardianship of JadwisiakOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Guardianship of RiderOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In re Guardianship of WellerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Brown v. HaffeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. In Re Estate of Poole v. Conwell, 88414 (5-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API