Legal Opinion

Reyes v. Egner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 8, 2010No. A-90 September Term 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

991 A.2d 216 (2010)

201 N.J. 417

Hermes REYES and Leonor Reyes, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Harry C. EGNER, Holly Egner, and Prudential Fox & Roach Realtors, Defendants-Respondents, and

Harry C. Egner and Holly Egner, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, and

Columbia Reyes, Third-Party Defendant/Fourth-Party Plaintiff,

v.

Prudential Fox & Roach Realtors, Fourth-Party Defendant.

No. A-90 September Term 2008

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 27, 2009.

Decided April 8, 2010.

John J. Novak, Toms River, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Novak, attorney; Deborah A. Plaia, on the briefs).

Michael T.…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API