Legal Opinion

Premo v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 2, 2008No. Case 07-13188Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AVERN COHN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is tort ease. Plaintiff Joelle Premo is suing defendants, the United States, the United States Postal Service, and “John Doe under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 1 28 U.S.C. § 1346 et seq., for injuries she suffered when she was struck by a postal truck. The government argues that summary judgment is appropriate on all of Premo’s claims because (1) her injuries do not constitute a “serious impairment of body function” under Michigan’s No-Fault…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API