Overall v. Bezeau
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mackinac. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
The action in the court below was upon a promissory note, the consideration of which appears to have been a stock of spirituous liquors. ■ The defendant proposed to show that the sale was illegal and the note consequently void, by showing that the plaintiff had not paid his tax to the State as a wholesale dealer, and, was therefore not at liberty to make such a sale. To give the evidence proposed any force, on the defendant’s own view of the case, it should first have appeared that the sale was one which only a wholesale dealer could lawfully make. Such was not the case here. Plaintiff owned…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Remy, Schmidt & Pleissner v. HealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Florida Packing & Ice Co. v. CarneySupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Commonwealth v. SilvermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Greenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Johnson v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.