Legal Opinion

Donlan v. Provident Institution for Savings

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 24, 1879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The Provident Institution for Savings paid the amount due on Ellen Donlan’s hank hook to a person unknown, who, after the death of Ellen, presented the book for payment, *184representing herself to be the person therein named, the defendant then, believing her to be the original depositor. The plaintiff, as executor of her will, now demands payment of the same. In defence of the action, the bank relies upon certain of its by-laws, made to guard against fraud in withdrawing deposits, which limit its responsibility for payments made under the circumstances here disclosed. These by-laws declare that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grace v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Goldrick v. Bristol County Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Levy v. Franklin Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stebbins v. North Adams Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Kergald v. Armstrong Transfer Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Chase v. Waterbury Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Wasilauskas v. Brookline Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Langdale v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API