Legal Opinion

People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus.

1Per curiam

Where a writ of replevin is dismissed *314by a justice, and defendant waives return, he has a right to introduce evidence to prove the value of the property, and mandamus will issue to compel the justice to receive it,' in case, he refuses to allow it. People v. Tripp, 15 Mich., 518; People ex rel. Forbes v. Judge of Washtenaw Circ. Ct., 23 Mich., 497.

■ Costs will not be granted against a party interested who has not been brought before this court by notice, in such a case.

Mandamus granted, without costs.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Forbes v. Judge of the Washtenaw Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People ex rel. Taylor v. TrippMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLeod v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Manchure v. Wayside Oil Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932