Legal Opinion

Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1994No. 20328PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

A jury determined that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State *132Farm) breached an oral contract to provide underinsured motorist coverage, and was es-topped from denying that coverage, to Harold and Hazel Young after they were injured in an automobile accident. State Farm appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict, alleging error in the district court’s denial of State Farm’s motion for a directed verdict and its post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. We conclude that the district court erred in denying State Farm’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Brand S Corp. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Corbridge v. Clark Equipment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Featherston Ex Rel. Featherston v. Allstate InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beco Construction Co. v. Harper Contracting, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API