Legal Opinion

M & T Mortgage Corp. v. Keesler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBender, J.

¶ 1 Andrew Fortuin (Appellant) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Pike County that denied his petition to set aside a sheriffs sale. Appellant raises an issue concerning the notice to him as an interested party. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

¶2 The real property at issue, which was the subject of a mortgage foreclosure action instituted by the mortgagee, M&T Mortgage Corporation (M & T), on October 11, 2001, was owned by Bethann L. Keesler f/k/a Bethann Gudd (Keesler). Judgment was entered against Ms. Kees-ler on November 28, 2001. In the interim, Ms. Keesler and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyer v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. First Eastern Bank, N.A. v. Campstead, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Jefferson Bank v. Newton AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. R & G Mortgage Corp. v. Sustache RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2004
  2. National City Mortgage Co. v. StephenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Citimortgage v. Novotny, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. HSBC Bank v. Carney, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Hargrove, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API