Howard v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Johnnie F. Howard seeks review of the final order denying his motion for postcon-viction relief, which was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Howard’s pro se motion and amended motion raised thirty-five claims, and he filed a supplement raising two additional claims. The postconviction court summarily denied twenty-five of these claims and denied the remaining twelve claims after an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm the summary deni al of Howard’s claims with the exception of claims 13B, 20, 27, and 30. We reverse the denial of those claims and remand…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frazier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Agent v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Mendez-Domingo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- West v. Secretary Department of Corrections (Duval County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024