Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 2009No. 2D06-1013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Johnnie F. Howard seeks review of the final order denying his motion for postcon-viction relief, which was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Howard’s pro se motion and amended motion raised thirty-five claims, and he filed a supplement raising two additional claims. The postconviction court summarily denied twenty-five of these claims and denied the remaining twelve claims after an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm the summary deni al of Howard’s claims with the exception of claims 13B, 20, 27, and 30. We reverse the denial of those claims and remand…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Spera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Agent v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Mendez-Domingo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. West v. Secretary Department of Corrections (Duval County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API