Lucy Mundia v. Drendall law Office, P.C.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pyle, Judge.
Statement of the Case
Our Indiana Supreme Court has explained that “Indiana’s distinctive summary judgment standard imposes a heavy factual burden on the movant to demonstrate the absence of any genuine issue of material fact on at least one element of the [non-movant’s] claim.” Siner v. Kindred Hosp. Ltd. P’ship, 51 N.E.3d 1184, 1187 (Ind. 2016) (citing Hughley v. State, 15 N.E.3d 1000, 1003 (Ind. 2014)).
This case is an example of the importance of a summary judgment movant meeting its initial burden when filing á summary judgment motion, the importance of designating evidence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CENSKE v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- CENSKE v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- Drendall Law Office, P.C. v. Lucy MundiaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Elaine Davey v. Richard E. Boston (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. METZGER ROSTA, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021