Legal Opinion

State v. Brisco

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 6, 2006No. 2004-K-3039PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

933 So.2d 754 (2006)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Mickel BRISCO.[1]

No. 2004-K-3039.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 6, 2006.

Charles C. Foti, Jr., Attorney General, J. Phil Haney, District Attorney, Walter J. Senette, Jr., Jeffrey J. Trosclair, Assistant District Attorneys, for applicant.

Richard A. Spears, New Iberia, for respondent.

WEIMER, Justice.

This matter is before the court for a determination of whether the State may invoke the firearm sentencing provisions set out in LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 893.1, et seq., to limit the trial court's discretion in sentencing when both the firearm sentencing provisions…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. DortheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  4. Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  5. Abl Mgmt. v. Board of Sup'rs of S. Univ.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. State v. RuffinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. State v. S.L.D.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API