Legal Opinion

Vandenberg v. Siter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1964No. Appeals, Nos. 347, 348, and 349PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The plaintiff, a grower and dealer in Holland, sued the defendants for the balance of the purchase price of certain tulip and hyacinth bulbs. The defendants counterclaimed for $9,036.97 averring breach of an express warranty that the bulbs were sound and healthy at *394the time of the shipment and implied warranties that they were merchantable and fit for the purpose for which they were sold.

The contract contained the following clause of warranty: “The seller warrants the goods to be sound and healthy at the time of shipment but does not otherwise warrant flowering or other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolstenholme, Inc. v. Jos. Randall Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & MacHine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Torrance v. Durisol, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1956
  4. Victorson v. Albert M. Green Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. National Container Corp. v. Regal Corrugated Box Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Wilson Trading Corp. v. David Ferguson, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Paul Vlases v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  5. Gustine Uniontown Associates, Ltd. Ex Rel. Gustine Uniontown, Inc. v. Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API