Legal Opinion

Calkin v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1943No. 35,716PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This was an action by the administrator c. t. a. of the estate of Charles Hudson, late of Kingman county, to obtain *309a declaratory judgment touching his right to sell certain lands in Barber county to raise funds to pay legacies provided for by the will of the testator. The lands involved were part of the estate of Charles at his death in 1916.

The legal question touching the propriety of the action and the correctness of the trial court’s decision turns upon facts about which there is no material dispute but which must be stated at length.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Malone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Drenning v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Dusenbery v. BidwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Hirt v. Bucklin State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Kirsch v. City of AbileneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Shell v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  3. Peters v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Western Shale Products Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Glenwood Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API