Legal Opinion
Pouliot v. Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 17, 2006No. CIV.A.3:02CV1302(JCH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW [Doc. No. 551], MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL [Doc. No. 552], AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON/INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S WITHDRAWN RECKLESSNESS CLAIM [Doc. No. 549]
HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Shawn Pouliot (“Pouliot”), was a truck driver who was severely injured while unloading freight from a truck owned by defendant Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc. The second defendant, Arpin Logistics, Inc., is the company that assigned Pouliot to this delivery. Pouliot claimed that the defendants (collectively “Arpin”1) provided…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Penry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Marilyn GALDIERI-AMBROSINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foradori v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Munn Ex Rel. C.M. v. Hotchkiss SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Munn v. Hotchkiss SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Dayter v. FallonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020