Nederlandsche Handel-Maatschappij, N. v. Also Known as Netherlands Trading Society v. Jay Emm, Inc., and Satiris G. Fassoulis
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge.
The sole question presented is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying, on June 12, 1961, the motion of the appellants, under Rule 60(b) (1) and (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to vacate the judgment taken against them by default on October 25, 1960. We find ample support for Judge Metzner’s refusal to set aside the default.
„T , . The plaintiff, a Netherlands corpora-turn brought suit, under the diversity junsdiction, in the Southern District of ew ore in o-rem er o en orce the guarantee of Safaris G Fassoulis on nine…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a Corporation v. Porter BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Assmann v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by31 opinions
- Davis v. MuslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Kevin Fleming v. New York UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Intercity Realty Company v. GibsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
- Clarkson Co. v. ShaheenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Square Construction Company and La Fera Contracting Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.