Legal Opinion

Beasley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 1989No. 87-3033PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his convictions for sexual battery, kidnapping, burglary, and robbery. We conclude that the evidence of other similar acts was properly admitted. § 90.404(2)(a), Fla.Stat.(1987); Bryan v. State, 533 So.2d 744 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1765, 104 L.Ed.2d 200 (1989); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959). No reversible error is shown in defendant’s second point on appeal.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolpert v. WASH. SQUARE OFFICE CTR.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989