Legal Opinion

Halsell v. Neal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Rici-iabd Mobgae.

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee,- Mary 0. Neal, 'joined pro forma by her husband, J. H. Neal, against W. J. Halsell, executor of the will of William Huff hiñes, deceased, and G-. K. Stratton, J. M. Stratton, and J ames F. Rowland, sure ties upon said executor’s bond, to recover a one-eighth interest in the estate of the said Huffhines. The only defense made to the suit was by plea setting up that by agreement of all the heirs of said Huffhines, the administration of his estate in the Connty Court was closed, and the executor released, and the entire estate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cockrill v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Steed v. PettyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Weaver v. NugentTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Ayers v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Producers' Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Gray v. VogelsangCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. J. W. Carter Music Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Galveston Theatres v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API