Legal Opinion
Trinity County Public Utilities District v. Harrington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1986No. 85-1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellants Trinity County Public Utility District, Hayfork Valley Public Utility District, Calaveras Public Power Agency, and Tuolumne County Public Power Agency appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment against them. The district court determined that the Trinity River Division Act and the Flood Control Act of 1962 gave appellants a first preference to energy and rates based on the Central Valley Project as a whole, rather than from the Trinity and New Melones plants. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The Central Valley Project (“CVP”) is a multipurpose…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Sacramento Municipal Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Power Authority of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Municipal Electric Utilities Association of New York, State of New York Public Service Commission, Expansion Power Industries, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company, Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative, Bethlehem Steel Corp., General Motors Corp., Occidental Chemical Corp., Hooker Industrial & Specialty Chemicals, Olin Corp. And Union Carbide Corp., Vermont Department of Public Service, Borough of Lansdale, Pennsylvania, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Arizona Power Authority v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James C. Svela v. Union Oil Company of California, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cook Inlet Native Association v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Trinity County Public Utilities District v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mobil Sales and Supply Corporation and Mobil Oil Corporation, Plaintiffs v. The Vessel Panamax Venus, and Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Equipment and Appurtenances, in Rem Alexandra Navigation Corp., Ltd. Eddie's Steamship Company, Ltd. And Eddies Shipping Agency, Inc., in Personam, Defendants- the Chase Manhattan Bank (National Association) as Mortgagee, Plaintiff-In- Intervention-Appellee v. Panamax Venus, Her Engines, Tackle, Furniture, Apparel, Appurtenances, Etc., in Rem and Alexandra Navigation Corporation, Ltd., in Personam, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Luis I. Batayola v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986