Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Braukman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 2008No. 06-35430PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*734MEMORANDUM **
Gregory and Arlene VanDeHey (“the VanDeHeys”) appeal from the district court’s order granting Allstate Insurance Company’s (“Allstate”) motion for summary judgment. The district court held the personal umbrella insurance policy Allstate issued to Eugene and Nancy Braukman (“the Braukmans”) did not provide coverage for claims made against the Braukmans by the VanDeHeys for injuries Gregory VanDeHey allegedly incurred due to Eugene Braukman’s negligent operation of a track hoe.
The state law of Oregon governs this diversity action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Sicor Ltd. v. Cetus Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Truck Ins. Exch.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Tualatin Valley Housing Partners v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- White v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Fire Insurance Company v. Mother Earth SchoolDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019