Laverty v. Hawkeye Security Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtSnell, J.
This is an action at law wherein plaintiff Carl F. Laverty seeks recovery for damage to his automobile and plaintiff Ruth F. Laverty seeks recovery for medical expense from defendant insurance company. The trial court found for plaintiffs -and defendant appealed. The trial court’s findings of fact are binding on us if supported by substantial evidence,.
Defendant says the insurance policy under which .plaintiffs seek recovery had expired and there was no insurance in force.
As Mrs. Laverty’s claim depends for validity on her husband’s claim he will be referred to as plaintiff.
■ The facts abound…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mooney v. NagelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Sanborn v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Forrest v. Sovereign Camp W.O.W.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Seymour v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Riggs v. MekaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Saunders v. Lloyd's of LondonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Barnhouse v. Hawkeye State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Manson State Bank v. DiamondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Johnston v. Percy Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.