Common Council of Village of Three Rivers v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph. (Loveridge, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action to recover- the amount of a tax assessed against defendant’s personal property by the assessor of the village in the year 1891. The defendant prevailed in the court below, and plaintiff appeals, alleging numerous errors. If the circuit judge was right in holding that the assessment was not legally made, because not made within the time required by the charter, and because defendant had no opportunity to have the assessment reviewed,, the other assignments of error become immaterial.
The charter provision relative to the review of assessments is as follows:
“Whenever the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Avery v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by10 opinions
- Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co. v. Common Council of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Prairie Oil Gas Co. v. Cruce, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Fink v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Petoskey & Bay Shore Gas Co. v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- School District v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.