Legal Opinion
Brooks v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 1, 2009No. 08-3225PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Terence Brooks sued defendant police officers Davey, Savickas, and Stegmiller, as individuals, and their employer, the City of Chicago. He alleged false arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; malicious prosecution under state law; false imprisonment under state law; and due process violations under § 1983. The district court dismissed Brooks’s federal claims and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. The court then denied Brooks’s motion to reconsider. Brooks appealed, and we now affirm.
I. Background
In his first amended complaint,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bielanski v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Demetrius McCann Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sam A. Mangialardi, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Laura Ann Juriss v. Paul McGowan and Russell Stanfield, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Kunz v. DeFeliceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Colbert v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Bloch v. FrischholzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Fox v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Craig Geness v. Jason CoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Omar Saunders-El v. Eric RohdeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.