Legal Opinion

St. Louis University v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 1, 2001No. 99-2227UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TRAXLER, Circuit Judge.

After an adverse jury verdict in a Missouri state court case involving a recipient of Orimune, an oral polio vaccine, St. Louis University (“SLU”) brought this contribution action against the United States government. SLU contended that the government’s improper approval of certain “seeds” of the polio vaccine was the cause of the state-court plaintiffs injuries and that the government was therefore required to contribute to the payment of the Missouri verdict. The district court first ruled that SLU was collaterally estopped from denying certain facts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. In Re: Genesys Data Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. St. Louis University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  2. American Cyanamid Company v. St. Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. St. Louis University v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. American Cyanamid Company v. St. Louis UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. St. Louis University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API