Legal Opinion

Stang v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 2008No. 4D07-4019PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

976 So.2d 656 (2008)

Warren STANG, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-4019.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 12, 2008.

Warren Stang, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

2Per curiam

Warren Stang seeks appellate review of an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion as untimely. We reverse and remand in part. Within his fifth point, Stang takes issue with the "time served" provisions of his March 2005 sentence imposed following a plea to violations of probation. Stang's claim is timely and should be considered on the merits to the extent his challenge…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardenbrook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Knowles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stang v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Knowles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. State v. StangSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  4. State v. StangSupreme Court of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API