Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, complaint reinstated, cross motion granted and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Royal Indemnity Company, the plaintiff in action No. 1, commenced a declaratory judgment action against defendants, seeking a declaration that it has no duty to provide coverage to the defendants nor to defend or indemnify defendants Kathy and Daniel Miller in an action brought against Daniel Miller by defendant Ellis (action No. 2). According to the complaint in action No. 2, in February 1989 *957Daniel Miller kicked and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Planet Insurance v. Bright Bay Classic Vehicles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Pawelek v. Security Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Security Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. LoveNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Waiting Room Solutions v. Excelsior Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API