Lambert v. State

OPINION

After being convicted, by jury verdict, of robbery (NRS 200.380), Larry James Lambert received an enhanced sentence for having used a deadly weapon while committing the robbery. 1 In asking us to reverse, Lambert contends: (1) the district court committed prejudicial error while orally instructing the jury, (2) he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel, (3) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, and (4) identification testimony by a prosecution witness should have been suppressed. None of the contentions has merit.

1. Lambert’s initial claim, raised for the…