Legal Opinion

New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection v. Pace

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 7, 2006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the Appellate Division that, generally, the statute of limitations on a claim for conversion of negotiable instruments begins to run from the date the instrument was negotiated. We add the following to clarify the application of that general rule.

In this case, an attorney misappropriated her clients’ funds “by forging their endorsements on settlement checks” and Summit Bank (Summit) “accept[ed] the forged ... checks for deposit.” New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Prot. v. Pace, 374 N.J.Super. 57, 59, 863 A.2d 402 (App.Div.2005). The New Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gerard C. Menichini, T/a Best Legal Services v. Lissa L. Grant Mellon Bank (East), Mellon Bank (East) National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Husker News Co. v. Mahaska State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. NEW JERSEY LAWYERS' v. PaceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Corporación Pública para la Supervisión v. González LópezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2010
  2. Mark D. Dean, P.S.C. v. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Specialized Loan Servicing, L.L.C. v. JanuarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  4. Psak, Graziano, Piasecki & Whitelaw v. Fleet National BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Bank OneIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API