Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Butte & Boston Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1907No. 2,430PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Geo. M. Bourquin, Judge. Action by Phil. J. Harrington against the Butte and Boston Mining Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This is the fourth appeal in this case. For a statement of the facts it will be sufficient to refer to the former decisions of this court. (Harrington v. Butte etc. Min. Co., 19 Mont. 411, 48 Pac. 758, 27 Mont. 1, 69 Pac. 102, 33 Mont. 330, 114 Am. St. Rep. 821, 83 Pac. 467.) In this instance the plaintiff had judgment in the district court, and from that judgment the defendants have appealed.

The first contention made is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment; but this contention cannot be considered. There is not any appeal from an order denying defendants a new trial.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Butte & Boston Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Frank v. SymonsMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Harrington v. Butte & Boston Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Harrington v. Butte & Boston Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leggat v. PalmerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ferrat v. AdamsonMontana Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API