Planing Mill Lumber Co. v. City of Chicago
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeals from the Superior Court of Chicago.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAllister
It is a singular circumstance, that, in all the thirty-one foregoing cases, there is not one record which contains a fiadla or convening order of the court. The same defect is apparent, also, in twenty-two other cases, brought from the same court, to, and decided at, the present term of this court. Rich and others v. The City of Chicago. Thus making fifty-three cases at one term; all coming from the same clerk’s office, in which the records are all wanting in this obvious requirement of a good record.
It is a matter of regret that we are compelled to reverse these cases for such a defect. But…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Law v. Jackson ex dem. LansingCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
- Bay v. GunnCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Utica Insurance v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1828
3Cited by14 opinions
- People ex rel. Peterson v. OmenIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Arkadelphia Lumber Co. v. AsmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- City of Alton v. HeidrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Swartzbaugh v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Skinner v. BeshoarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1874
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.