Williams v. State

By an information the appellant was charged in one count with possession of narcotic implements and in a second count with unlawful possession of marijuana. He was acquitted of the first charge and convicted of the second. On this appeal therefrom it is contended the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction and that possession of marijuana is not possession of an “hallucinogenic drug” as proscribed in the statute under which the charge was laid. On consideration of those contentions in the light of the record and briefs we hold they are without merit. The court did not err in…