Central Mut. Ins. v. Tartar
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant issued a policy of insur-anee to Calderone agreeing to idemnify him against loss from liability imposed upon him by law for the personal injury or death of any person caused by the operation of a truck. An agent of Calderone, while operating the truck, caused the death of Gentry, appellee’s intestate, in Pulaski county, Ky. Appellee sued Calderone in the state court and obtained a judgment on which execution was issued and returned “no *840property found.” Later the appellee brought this suit against appellant under clauses in the policy providing that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Ocean Accident & Guaranty Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Eagle Indemnity Co. v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1943
- Central Mut. Ins. Co. v. PippenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Boulter v. Commercial Standard Ins.District Court, N.D. California · 1948