Mariemont Corp. v. White City Water Improvement District
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
White City Water Improvement District and several other interested individuals (collectively, “the Water District”) bring this interlocutory appeal from a ruling of the Third District Court. The district court ruled that sections 17A-2-334 and -335 of the Utah Code (“the withdrawal statute”), permitting withdrawal from a special improvement district upon petition by “a majority of the real property owners” of a territory, should be interpreted according to their plain language. The court then held that to determiné whether a majority of real property owners have petitioned…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Craftsman Builder's Supply, Inc. v. Butler Manufacturing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
- Gutierrez v. MedleyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Cox v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Gray and RiceUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Savely v. Utah Highway PatrolUtah Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.