Legal Opinion

Mariemont Corp. v. White City Water Improvement District

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1998No. 960369PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

White City Water Improvement District and several other interested individuals (collectively, “the Water District”) bring this interlocutory appeal from a ruling of the Third District Court. The district court ruled that sections 17A-2-334 and -335 of the Utah Code (“the withdrawal statute”), permitting withdrawal from a special improvement district upon petition by “a majority of the real property owners” of a territory, should be interpreted according to their plain language. The court then held that to determiné whether a majority of real property owners have petitioned…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re WorthenUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Craftsman Builder's Supply, Inc. v. Butler Manufacturing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gutierrez v. MedleyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cox v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re Gray and RiceUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Savely v. Utah Highway PatrolUtah Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API