Legal Opinion · Dissent

Missouri Bankers Association, Inc., and Jonesburg State Bank v. St. Louis County, Missouri, and Charlie A. Dooley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 12, 2014No. SC93848Published

1DissentRichard B. Teitelman, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the principal opinion’s holding that the County’s foreclosure ordinance is void because it exceeds the County’s legislative power granted by article VI, section 18(c) of the Missouri Constitution. I would hold that the ordinance is a valid exercise of the County’s legislative power because the ordinance is precisely tailored to the local symptoms of the foreclosure crisis.1

Article VI, section 18(c) authorizes a charter county to enact legislation concerning “any and all services and functions of any municipality or political subdivisions, except school…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shepley v. GambleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Equality Savings & Building Ass'n v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Flower Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. Casper Ex Rel. Residents of Warson View Subdivision v. HetlageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. St. Louis County v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API