Legal Opinion

Brown v. Dailey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County, July Term, 1885, W. B, Staley, Ch,

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

The bill in this cause was filed for settlement of the partnership of Dailey & Brown, in the livery business in Knoxville. Answer being filed and account ordered, much proof was taken, and the Master reported.

Subsequently he made a second report.

Various exceptions were filed, and with some modifications, not necessai’y to be noticed, the report was confirmed.

Both complainant and defendant appealed, and their counsel argue here with much zeal and ability their several exceptions to the Master’s report.

We have held that where, in a matter of account, the Master and the Chancellor have agreed…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dale v. HartmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Reed Bros. Stone Co., Inc. v. Pittman Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  3. Railroad v. KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Hopkins v. First Tennessee National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  5. Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API