Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 2006No. 92,541PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J.:

Mikkel Parker seeks this court’s review of the Court of Appeals opinion affirming his conviction for possession of cocaine. Parker claims that the Court of Appeals and the trial court should have excluded evidence because it was seized while he was unlawfully detained. Parker further claims that widrout the unlawfully seized evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction.

FACTS

Officer Bachmann received information from another Wichita police officer that some guys were hanging out in a garage at an apartment complex.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. EppersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  4. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. United States v. Anthony Marcellus BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. Boyle v. McKuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. State v. ReissSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API