State v. Parker
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Rosen, J.:
Mikkel Parker seeks this court’s review of the Court of Appeals opinion affirming his conviction for possession of cocaine. Parker claims that the Court of Appeals and the trial court should have excluded evidence because it was seized while he was unlawfully detained. Parker further claims that widrout the unlawfully seized evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction.
FACTS
Officer Bachmann received information from another Wichita police officer that some guys were hanging out in a garage at an apartment complex.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. EppersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- United States v. Anthony Marcellus BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Boyle v. McKuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. ReissSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.