Legal Opinion

Nordgren v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1983No. 81-2283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellants are defendants in paternity actions filed in the Utah state courts. Utah’s method of resolving paternity disputes is similar to the Connecticut system described in Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1, 101 S.Ct. 2202, 68 L.Ed.2d 627 (1981). When Utah’s department of social services pays child support benefits, it becomes the *1336“trustee” of the mother’s or child’s cause of action for support. Utah Code Ann. § 78-45b-3(l). Paternity and support obligations can be determined in the same action, in which the department is a real party in interest. Id. §§ 78-45a-2,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Edward John Walker v. Ray McLain Sheriff of Lincoln County, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Lavertue v. NimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. YelliNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Interest of JMSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Allen v. Division of Child Support Enforcement ex rel. WareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API