Legal Opinion

Miocene Ditch Co. v. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1907No. 1,254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, Circuit Judge

Objection is made on the part of the appellee and respondent to the right of this court to review the order in question. We have no doubt of our jurisdiction to do so. The amendment to the plaintiff’s complaint brought into the controversy waters in no way , embraced by the original complaint, and the decree that was vacated by the order undertook to fix the rights of the respective parties thereto in connection with their respective rights to the waters covered by the original complaint. Therefore the order vacating and setting aside the decree, the findings, conclusions of law, the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. In Re NeagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Banca Commerciale Italiana Trust Co. v. Westchester Artistic Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Barber-Colman Co. v. Magnano Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  3. McFarland v. Alaska Perseverance Mining Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1907
  4. Jackson v. United Railways Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API