Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chastain v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 16, 1937Published

1Dissent

Brown, J.,

(dissenting) — The evidence in this case raises such a serious doubt of the guilt of the defendant that I think that in the interest of justice this defendant, plaintiff in error here, should have a new trial. In the excitement of the moment, the opportunity of the bank cashier to plainly see the man (whom he testified was' one of the four who held up the bank) and subsequently identify him, was so very limited that it rendered the coirectness of his subsequent identification very doubtful, whereas the testimony of a number of witnesses, showed that at the time of the bank robbery…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Heath v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Commercial Investment Trust v. CalhounSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API