Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Alnoa G. Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 1982No. 18132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Chief Justice.

The appellee brought this action to contest a paving assessment against its properties levied pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Houston. After hearing the evidence, the trial court declared the ordinance void insofar as it affected the appellee’s properties, holding the City’s action was arbitrary and capricious.

In two points of error, the City contends that the trial court erred in finding that the assessment was not supported by substantial evidence, and in determining that the action of City Council was arbitrary and capricious. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Familias Unidas, an Unincorporated Association, and Irma Torrez v. Dolph BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Hutcheson v. StorrieTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. City of Houston v. BlackbirdTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Foxworth-Galbraith Lumber Co. v. Realty Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. City of Addison, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  2. Smith v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1992
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API