Connecticut National Bank v. Gager
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The named defendant, George W. Gager,1 appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court, which granted the motion of the substitute plaintiff, Anne D. Sanger, to correct the record. The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted Sanger’s motion to correct the record on the ground that the recorded order of the trial court contained a clerical error. The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court, concluding that there was an inadequate record for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Matza v. MatzaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut National Bank v. GagerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Cavanaugh v. Newtown Bridle Lands Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. DenyaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Morris v. Cee Dee, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Gager v. SangerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.