Lanning Construction, Inc. v. Rozell
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Justice.
Appellant brought this action to recover for work performed for appellee. The jury awarded appellant $2,400. Appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted and a judgment was entered accordingly. This appeal is from the order and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm.
Appellant is a family corporation that operates heavy equipment to clear land and do earthwork. The firm’s two full time employees, who also operate the equipment, are the president, Ronald J. Lanning, and *523his son, Daniel J. Lanning, the vice president. Both corporate officers…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Farmers' Elevator Co. v. SwierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Heiser v. RodwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Billera v. Custom Laminating Window Products, Inc.Palm Beach County Court · 1985
- Jensen v. WeyrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Jensen v. WeyrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991