Legal Opinion

Lanning Construction, Inc. v. Rozell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1982No. 13397PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.

Appellant brought this action to recover for work performed for appellee. The jury awarded appellant $2,400. Appellee’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted and a judgment was entered accordingly. This appeal is from the order and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm.

Appellant is a family corporation that operates heavy equipment to clear land and do earthwork. The firm’s two full time employees, who also operate the equipment, are the president, Ronald J. Lanning, and *523his son, Daniel J. Lanning, the vice president. Both corporate officers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Farmers' Elevator Co. v. SwierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Heiser v. RodwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Billera v. Custom Laminating Window Products, Inc.Palm Beach County Court · 1985
  2. Jensen v. WeyrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jensen v. WeyrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API