Legal Opinion

Littlewood's Will

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Eock «county: Johf E. Benfett, Circuit Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion. Tbis language is so broad that it carries a fee, and a remainder over is void for repugnancy. 2 Eedf. Wills, 278; ■Stowell v. Hastings, 59 Yt. 494; Bodenfels v. Schumann, 45 N. J. Eq. 383; Hall v. Paimer, 87 Ya. 354; Judevinds Bairs ■

1Opinion of the CourtWinslow, J.

This is a proceeding to construe a will. James-Littlewood died, leaving a widow and son surviving, and a-, will, the material parts of which are as follows:

“ I hereby give and bequeath to my beloved wife, Mary JS. Littlewood, for her sole benefit, all of my estate, real and personal, of every kind and nature whatsoever. I hereby appoint my wife, Marry E. Littlewood, the guardian of the-person of my beloved son, George Littlewood, and of the-estate, and appoint her, Mary E. Littlewood, the executor of my last will, and desire that no bonds shall be required of' Mary E. Littlewood as executor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lovass v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Will of KopmeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Estate of Holmes v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hovely v. HerrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wheeler v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Carrow v. ThroppCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API