Foreman v. Atlantic Land Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
This is an action by the Estate of Clay P. Talbott and Julian W. Foreman for injuries received while the two men were employed by American Boring & Tunnelling Company (BorTunCo.). A crane operated by Harry M. Hutson, allegedly an employee of respondent Atlantic Land Corporation (ALC), came into contact with an SCE&G power line. The electric shock was transmitted via the crane to Talbott and Foreman who were standing on the ground nearby.
The trial court granted SCE&G’s and ALC’s motions for summary judgment. We affirm as to SCE&G and reverse as to ALC.
I. Summary Judgment for SCE&G
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Trimyer v. Norfolk Tallow Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Woody v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Larman v. Kodiak Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. LumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lovell v. Oahe Electric CooperativeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Holmes v. Black River Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Cianbro Corp. v. Jeffcoat and MartinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
- Hensley v. HeavrinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Haskins v. Fairfield Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.