Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Atlantic Land Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 20, 1978No. 20718PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is an action by the Estate of Clay P. Talbott and Julian W. Foreman for injuries received while the two men were employed by American Boring & Tunnelling Company (BorTunCo.). A crane operated by Harry M. Hutson, allegedly an employee of respondent Atlantic Land Corporation (ALC), came into contact with an SCE&G power line. The electric shock was transmitted via the crane to Talbott and Foreman who were standing on the ground nearby.

The trial court granted SCE&G’s and ALC’s motions for summary judgment. We affirm as to SCE&G and reverse as to ALC.

I. Summary Judgment for SCE&G

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trimyer v. Norfolk Tallow Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Woody v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  4. Larman v. Kodiak Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. LumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lovell v. Oahe Electric CooperativeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Holmes v. Black River Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Cianbro Corp. v. Jeffcoat and MartinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  4. Hensley v. HeavrinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Haskins v. Fairfield Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API