Legal Opinion

Eikel v. Burton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1975No. 16565PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This suit was filed by John P. Bristow to recover $3,500.00 which he alleged he had loaned to the defendants. Bristow died pri- or to trial. Upon suggestion of such death being entered of record in open court, the trial court permitted the case to be prosecuted by Robert Eikel, the Testamentary Executor of the Succession of John P. Bris-tow, Deceased, under appointment by a court of the State of Louisiana. Judgment was entered in the trial court that the plaintiff take nothing. We reverse and remand.

It is settled that a foreign administrator cannot bring suit in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WarnaschTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. PughTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Faulkner v. ReedTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Holland v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Meredith v. SharpTexas Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McAdams v. Capitol Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Minga v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Perez v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  5. Roy Elza, as Independent of the Estate of Annette Elza v. Angela Roann Newton and Randy Newton, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API